Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Atlantic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Hitachi Consulting (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 03:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra Atlantic[edit]

Sierra Atlantic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for this organization turns up a number of hits, but they all seem to be WP:TRIVIAL mentions ("...Subbu Venkataraman, a vice president at Sierra Atlantic...", etc.). Failed to find significant in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources, propose it be deleted. KDS4444Talk 05:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 20:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 20:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can anyone verify if the 3,000 employee count in the current article is accurate? This source looks ok and I have a hard time seeing deleting an article on a company with 3,000 staff. CorporateM (Talk) 02:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now. Doesn't look like this organization's 3,000 members have done enough to get any mentions in Notable sources. If the outfit has any staying power, somebody, somewhere is going to write about it. Hasn't happened yet. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.